Gobernanza algorítmica y democracia: desafíos éticos de la inteligencia artificial en el estado

Authors

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, social protection, algorithmic discrimination, social justice

Abstract

This study examines the social, ethical, and legal implications of using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the administration of social services, particularly in the identification and management of vulnerable populations. Through a mixed-methods approach, the research explored both the perceptions of key social actors and the concrete impact of algorithms used in automated systems for evaluating beneficiaries. The findings show that although AI can enhance operational efficiency and enable faster resource allocation, it may also reinforce structural biases and lead to algorithmic discrimination, especially affecting historically marginalized groups. The study identifies risks such as system opacity, limited institutional accountability, and insufficient citizen participation in the design and implementation processes of these technologies. The discussion highlights the urgent need for regulatory frameworks that ensure ethical AI aligned with human rights and principles of social justice. The development of algorithmic impact assessment tools, along with strategies for transparency, public engagement, and democratic oversight, are proposed as key pillars for fair AI governance in the field of social protection. The conclusion emphasizes that without a human-centered, inclusive, and regulated approach, the deployment of these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities and seriously compromise equitable access to basic rights and services. A collective and interdisciplinary effort is essential to achieve the ethical integration of AI into social policy.

Author Biographies

  • Viviana Priscila Neira Quinteros, Universidad Nacional de Educación UNAE

     

     

     

  • Jose Daniel Rosado Espinoza, Universidad Espíritu Santos

     

     

     

References

Amnistía Internacional. (2024). Preocupaciones sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial en la gestión de prestaciones sociales. https://www.deia.eus/bermatu/2024/11/28/amnistia-intencional-denuncia-ia-discriminatoria-8990461.html

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.scirp.org/journal/home?issueid=17183

Australian Government. (2021). AI Ethics Framework. Departamento de Industria, Ciencia, Energía y Recursos. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-artificial-intelligence-ethics-principles/australias-ai-ethics-principles

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5632

Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. MIT Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335370554_Artificial_unintelligence_How_computers_misunderstand_the_world_By_meredith_broussard_Cambridge_MA_MIT_press_2018_246_pp_1142_paper_ISBN_9780262537018_paperback

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. https://www.academia.edu/6595820/Erik_Brynjolffson_and_Andrew_McAfee_The_Second_Machine_Age_Work_Progress_and_Prosperity_in_a_Time_of_Brilliant_Technologies_review_

Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-021-01385-5

El Ethos digital en la Regulación Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Gestión Pública. (2025). Revista Científica De Ciencias Humanas Y Sociales RECIHYS, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24133/recihys.v3.i1.4090

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.

European Commission. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence.

European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206

Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., Orton, I., & Dale, P. (2020). Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVI D-19: A Real-Time Review of Country Measures. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/33635

Government of Canada. (2022). Algorithmic Impact Assessment Tool and Ethical Guidelines.

Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2016). Innovation and Intellectual Property: Collaborative Dynamics in Africa. OECD Publishing. https://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/861342747.pdf

Lazcoz Moratinos, A., & Castillo Parrilla, E. (2020). El caso SyRI y la protección de los derechos fundamentales en la era digital. Revista de Derecho y Tecnología. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-2584.2020.56843

Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.

OECD. (2020). The Future of Work and Skills. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-employment-outlook-2020_1686c758-en.html

OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance: Digital Government Strategies.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.3.403

Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.

Pasquale, F. (2020). New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI. Harvard University Press.

Richardson, R., Schultz, J. M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice. NYU Law Review. https://creatingfutureus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/RichardsonEtAl-2019-DirtyData.pdf

Susskind, R. (2022). Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. Oxford University Press.

Topol, E. (2019). Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books.

United Nations. (2021). AI for Good Global Summit. https://press.un.org/en/2024/sgsm22251.doc.htm

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2019.1637914

Downloads

Published

2025-02-19

How to Cite

Segarra Figueroa, O. P., Neira Quinteros, V. P., Sumba Arévalo, V. M., & Rosado Espinoza, J. D. (2025). Gobernanza algorítmica y democracia: desafíos éticos de la inteligencia artificial en el estado. Sage Sphere in Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 1-11. http://sagespherejournal.com/index.php/SSAI/article/view/91